Most of those Walmart employees are kept at less than 40 hours a week at minimum wage so that Walmart doesn't have to pay benefits or provide sick days etc. Do we really want an entire nation working but still living at poverty level?
No, I certainly do not want the cold, heartless, greedy people running Walmart in charge of the country. I think we've had enough of that and look where it's gotten us.
Our retired seniors get both Social Security and Medicare, such as it is. If Walmart were in charge, they'd get nothing. And neither is "broken". What's broken is a Congress that is more concerned with preventing our current president from getting anything done to prevent his re-election, than to do anything to help the citizens of this country.
The owners of Walmart have paid fewer taxes every year for decades and they have NOT passed their profits on to their employees. They are no job creators. They are the 1% and I will not protect or make excuses for their greed.
They have gotten away with this because they own the 1%ers making the laws, laws that only benefit the 1%.
I say throw the 1%ers OUT of Congress and start abiding by our Constitution instead of doing end runs around it, ignoring it and rewriting it.
Money is not speech and corporations are not people. Government should serve the people, not corporations.
I am not a moron because I do not shop at Walmart. EVER.
I'm one of the 99% that wants the 1% to pay their fair share.





The revenue generated by the 1983 regressive payroll tax hike was used to replace the revenue lost as a result of the Reagan income tax cuts. The net effect was a transfer of income and wealth from low and middle-income taxpayers to the richest ten percent of taxpayers. Absolutely none of the revenue from the 1983 payroll tax hike went to Social Security. It all went into the general fund and was used to pay for tax cuts, wars, and other government programs. Since the missing Social Security money ended up in the pockets of the rich, I propose that a special tax be levied against this group of taxpayers with the revenue specifically earmarked for repayment of the looted Social Security money
The government has violated both the public trust and federal law. The Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 included an amendment sponsored by Senator Ernest Hollings of SC. That law made it illegal for the government to continue spending Social Security money for other purposes. President George H.W. Bush signed the legislation into law and then proceded to spend the money just like before.
Absolutely none of the money was "invested" in Treasury bonds or anything else. It was all spent, and once money is spent, there is nothing left to invest. What the government did is clearly illegal.
And we can't use the term "borrowed" unless the money is repaid. If it is not repaid, it was clearly STOLEN.
Allen W. Smith, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics, Emeritus
Eastern Illinois University
Website: www.thebig